Human–AI & organizational capacity
How does AI change the work people can accomplish—and the demands placed on them?
Focus areas include human–AI augmentation, sustainable performance, and AI-generated operational demand.
Research & Advisory
Research built for real decisions.
Applied analysis that helps leaders understand emerging security, surveillance, governance, and human–AI challenges without losing sight of operational reality.
Current research program
Human capacity, security technology, and accountable systems.
The current body of work examines how organizations adopt powerful technologies while maintaining human capacity, governance, accountability, and sustainable performance.
Explore Devin Lambeth’s working papers and preprints on Zenodo. Each publication record provides the paper’s abstract, available files, version details, and citation information.
OPEN
Explore the publications
View current papers, abstracts, publication dates, files, versions, citation information, and persistent DOI records directly through Zenodo.
Find Papers on ZenodoResearch themes
Questions that connect technology to practice.
Three connected areas frame the current research program.
Surveillance & governance
What oversight is needed when surveillance tools become part of everyday operations?
Focus areas include automated license plate recognition (ALPR), surveillance accountability, and governance practices.
Accountability & evidence
What can an organization demonstrate about how its systems are governed and used?
Focus areas include audit maturity, transparent methods, and the relationship between documented controls and available evidence.
Advisory capabilities
Evidence organized around the decision at hand.
Research engagements can stand alone or support a security assessment, governance initiative, grant application, or technology decision.
Policy Analysis
Compare written requirements, governance structures, operating practices, and implementation gaps.
Benchmarking
Assess how peer organizations, standards, public sources, and recognized practices address a shared problem.
Program Evaluation
Examine whether a program’s design, controls, evidence, and observed results support its intended purpose.
Evidence Reviews
Translate a complex or emerging body of information into a decision-focused summary with clear limitations.
Executive Reports
Present findings, uncertainty, implications, and choices in language leadership can use.
Research Design
Define research questions, evidence boundaries, methods, coding approaches, and transparent analytical structure.
Research standards
- Separate verified evidence from institutional or vendor claims
- Document methods and source limitations
- Avoid treating absence of public evidence as proof of absence
- Distinguish exploratory findings from validated conclusions
- Preserve a clear audit trail from source to finding
Responsible analysis
Useful research must show its boundaries.
Secure Sight’s research approach emphasizes transparent methods, careful claim classification, and practical interpretation. Findings should be strong enough to support a decision while remaining honest about what the available evidence can—and cannot—establish.
For readers & collaborators
Read, cite, and build on the research.
Check the paper’s status
Working papers and preprints may be revised. Check the publication record and the paper itself for its date, version, methods, limitations, and any stated peer-review status.
Cite the version you use
Use the citation information on the individual publication record. Include the author, title, year, version when relevant, and the DOI associated with the work you consulted.
Discuss a finding or question
For research questions, potential collaboration, or a correction, include the paper’s title or DOI, the relevant passage, and the question or evidence you would like to discuss.
Start a research discussionA question worth examining
Need evidence before making the decision?
Define the research question, the evidence required, and how the result will be used.